POLITICAL FINANCE AND FINANCIAL POLITICS ®

THE ARCH PRINCE IKPE UNO

The reality is that it is not making any new money, it is spending money it makes by bullying potential customers for my Books into parting with a portion of income set out to engage with me and this is reflected from the obsessive need of its celebrities to immerse themselves in the effects of my personality and all I did when I stepped outside of my door, while their popularity fools threatened me over smell issues and set me out as victim - my problem has since become one of how I got to ensure they played with their own career and channelled their narcissism elsewhere before I felt compelled to channel it for them, how I got to ensure they stopped investing that nonsense at my expense, how I got to ensure it made comments about its career which is the source of all the fuss around here, instead of mine and stopped shooting off its big mouth at me about what it claims was a power issue, backed by incredibly stupid women who wished they had a military to protect them like Royalty did, believing they could play with me as they wished through media advertisement.

The tin can feminism can always stop when it turns out they rewarded those who violated them like they loved to seek out a way of doing to good people, the male society can always stop when you decided it was not in your nature to allow them enjoy the outdoors without abuses all the way, the Celebrities can also stop picking up my public image and earnings to be caught up in a process of killing themselves instead, when and if I decided my days of feeling ill because of the verbose corrupt insults which made it possible was over. There are however the fundamental questions of whether anybody has ever seen them explain the reasons their neighbourhoods are always full of crime, added to that occupied by those they claim lived a life they used to make themselves famous, why it was that each time those crimes were stopped, they built communities that fingered peoples bums, claiming they had to reorganise their stupid lives, have we ever seen them point out a single person that must have consigned them to fringe society, if their stupidities were incredibly uncomfortable living in it?

Officially the statement made for me is that I am a character who had nothing but wanted so badly to decide how others behaved. It is utter nonsense naturally as the history here is more of the various ways of abusively deciding what I was forcibly made to do to serve them and make them feel privileged. We had since arrived at a stage where the social disposition was one in which I did not possess the language by which to make sense of the insults and abuses that were to make it possible for them and the overarching premise was one in which the fact I had dropped out of University was the last straw tolerating it, whereby none was better off the fact that they had a need to cling to my income margins and remind me every day. As far back as I can remember, they have always done this – set people up on a pedestal and set about sorting their lives by abusing such victims, as though they were the only people who washed laundry in the entire world, it goes all the way back to school when they first invented their plans to be wealthy and important. the disillusionment that comes off it being the idea that I was not necessarily right and they were not necessarily wrong and this will be the part where they had destroyed people completely and were making a lot of money off the desperation of victims who wanted the lifestyle that they had – always best for people to chose the effects of immoral society because they believed it would serve them better, then find a way to make somebody else pay the price when the consequences turned up. They have been reading star signs to such an extent at this stage that they claim I said what I said because I wanted people to think I was not affected, whilst the reality is that they had built me a profile which converted the way I had run my finances, into a real problem i.e. not setting out to be wealthy until certain matters concerning my authority had been clearly ironed out, had instead become a matter of Royalty who was ruined and had to take out a day job, whereas the business of taking out a day job was the actual social life that came with the territory and not meant to be a problem, such that like a bunch of gits who only understood extreme violence, if I faced them down to resolve the matter and get the finances running again, the outcome will be that I was playing their game as well. We are currently doing the little bits where it seems I am always able to make sense of the life where Royalty got a day job, better than they can because it is my own social life and therefore they can never win – the continued need to attack me on this basis only likely to build up to a government intervention in celebrity influences at the work place, whereby Celebrities make people feel like hell all day and then play music CDs to make them feel better when they were at work – the problem for me personally being that some of the best songs were a product of my public life and we can see an example of the problem which goes beyond the way that they chose to run it so abusively, to a matter of me being unable to control what my tummy did when I engaged with others during the day. Here it is said I once played the Celebrity game as myself which is not necessarily the case – reality is that it was wealth equity popular culture, which criticised the actions of criminals – what the famous gits came up with, is to suggest that the criminals were our stars, in the sense that famous people had stars and our own were criminals, running off the statement when none asked their appraisal or opinion on the matter, whilst deciding they were to find some public dignitaries that will be their stars, in a bid to be superior, having since settled on the idea I fit the bill better than most (when I say they were a people who only could make sense of extreme violence when they were not committing suicide because they were famous). They do claim this is all prelude to something I am planning but it is not – the reality we lived in is one in which they never stopped trashing my finances by picking up my public image, having decided to convert my wealth equity into a means by which I got bullied when they befriended the wealthy, I have tried all options and failed miserably to get them on side while they updated the gimmicks on any new thing I did with my career, so I now wish to set them up as publicity for all I did with my concerns and replace them with the correct people, preferably family, with respect to being able to tell what I am capable of, the initial gimmick for the time being is that they had become very wealthy and powerful feminists and planned to keep it that way. They claim this chosen social life of mine is stressful thereof but all the stress were as I mentioned, the things which showed they were only able to make sense of extreme violence i.e. the distant violence that destroyed the health because they were wrapping victims around their fingers, it is usually painful enough and occurs everyday to ensure sense was made of victims who did not want to serve them for a purpose they thought they were entitled, existing in a social quagmire which made sense of it all. For my part the emphasis must not depart from the reasons they needed to find real toys they can play with, over those gimmicks where I then had to catalogue a set of behaviour over a 6 year period, to show clients what they did with my Books and what I did about it, therefore being able to pay my way in the world from my career when my Book was worthy of my Clients cash, it does need to put a stop to it or I will stop it badly. The matter raised by the authorities was one in which the reasons for their behaviour was not fully comprehended but it was a simple matter of Politicians running public policy with the help of fringe society criminals: it had since built up to show its true colours – the men hated Russians and Islamic terrorists but it was all the fault of the women, the women have now fought back, so they hated Russians properly and openly, therefore it was another person’s fault that they wanted to start a world war three, the women had also started their own on the feminist front and together both was the means by which their successes were to be built on a business of ripping up the lives and bodies of other peoples children, mine which had since ended up in a situation where they fought my wars and had the only right to decide what was to be done with it. I am then informed that Russians really were a threat more or less and yes I know that but the threat should be understood, it is a case between Russians and the abusive Show business industry whilst the rest of us were victims of State Offices work that Washington had exposed to Gold diggers and prostitutes.

I. Uno I

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland